June 16, 2025

The Decision-Making Revolution: How to Transform Your Business Through Strategic Choices

In this episode, Michael Barbarita and Chuki Obiyo reveal why most business owners struggle with decision-making despite having access to more information than ever before. You'll discover the "Strategic Decision Framework" that enables business owners to make better, faster decisions that consistently drive profitable growth. Learn how to cut through analysis paralysis, make confident choices under uncertainty, and create a decision-making culture that accelerates business success.

Powerful Business Strategies is broadcast live Mondays at 12 Noon ET Music on W4CY Radio (www.w4cy.com) part of Talk 4 Radio (www.talk4radio.com) on the Talk 4 Media Network (www.talk4media.com). Powerful Business Strategies is viewed on Talk 4 TV (www.talk4tv.com).

Powerful Business Strategies Podcast is also available on Talk 4 Media (www.talk4media.com), Talk 4 Podcasting (www.talk4podcasting.com), iHeartRadio, Amazon Music, Pandora, Spotify, Audible, and over 100 other podcast outlets.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/powerful-business-strategies--6198916/support.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:02.520
The topics and opinions expressed in the following show are

2
00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:04.160
solely those of the hosts and their guests and not

3
00:00:04.200 --> 00:00:07.080
those of W FOURCY Radio. It's employees are affiliates. We

4
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:10.240
make no recommendations or endorsements for radio show programs, services,

5
00:00:10.320 --> 00:00:12.640
or products mentioned on air or on our web. No

6
00:00:12.720 --> 00:00:15.919
liability explicitor implies shall be extended to W FOURCY Radio

7
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:18.719
or its employees are affiliates. Any questions or comments should

8
00:00:18.719 --> 00:00:21.079
be directed to those show hosts. Thank you for choosing

9
00:00:21.199 --> 00:00:23.519
W FOURCY Radio.

10
00:00:27.559 --> 00:00:31.120
Welcome to Powerful Business Strategies, where you will find out

11
00:00:31.160 --> 00:00:34.479
that everything you have ever learned about growing your business

12
00:00:34.759 --> 00:00:38.520
is wrong. Finally, a show where you'll learn the right

13
00:00:38.560 --> 00:00:41.880
way to grow your business by learning business and financial

14
00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:46.560
strategies that your competition isn't doing. And now here is

15
00:00:46.640 --> 00:00:51.759
your host. President of Next Step CFO Michael Barbarita and

16
00:00:51.960 --> 00:00:55.920
joining Michael for today's show as an executive moderator is

17
00:00:56.159 --> 00:00:58.880
chooky obia.

18
00:01:01.159 --> 00:01:03.960
Yes, yes, yes, this is Trueke and I believe that

19
00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:08.400
gratitude is undefeated and growth is about the next step.

20
00:01:08.959 --> 00:01:09.760
It is an.

21
00:01:09.640 --> 00:01:12.239
Honor for me to moderate today's discussion with my good

22
00:01:12.239 --> 00:01:12.879
friend Michael.

23
00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:15.239
Michael, how are you fantastic, Chucky?

24
00:01:15.319 --> 00:01:17.719
And that's Chicky stead my name, it's Michael Baberita, Prince

25
00:01:17.719 --> 00:01:20.439
it of Next Step CFO, and Next Step CFO is

26
00:01:20.480 --> 00:01:24.959
a fractional CFO and strategic commvitation firm. Business owners hire

27
00:01:25.040 --> 00:01:27.879
us to double and triple their profit using business and

28
00:01:27.959 --> 00:01:32.480
financial strategies that their competition isn't doing. And our vision

29
00:01:32.560 --> 00:01:36.599
is to ensure that overwhelmed business owners achieve consistent profits

30
00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:39.359
that lead to time, freedom to build a legacy and

31
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:41.760
the life they desire. And our mission is dedicated to

32
00:01:41.840 --> 00:01:46.640
guiding small business owners to leveraging their time, exploding their profits,

33
00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:50.000
and building a meaningful legacy. And this show Powerful Business

34
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:52.599
Strategies in our book of the same name, is a

35
00:01:52.719 --> 00:01:56.000
step toward accomplishing that vision and mission. So with that,

36
00:01:56.400 --> 00:01:58.599
I'd like to hand it back to my co author

37
00:01:58.640 --> 00:02:01.000
and moderator for the show, Chicky Obio.

38
00:02:01.519 --> 00:02:01.840
Michael.

39
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:06.719
Look, I'm really energized by today's episode. You're getting after

40
00:02:06.760 --> 00:02:09.800
something that a lot of business owners struggle with and

41
00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:14.039
really leaders decision making, So I'm looking forward to the

42
00:02:14.159 --> 00:02:17.280
strategic insights that you've got in that regard. Look, Michael

43
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:20.319
and I are both affiliated with a number of different organizations,

44
00:02:20.439 --> 00:02:23.759
and I currently serve as the managing director of business

45
00:02:23.759 --> 00:02:27.919
development for Better Price, a global business focused law firm.

46
00:02:28.039 --> 00:02:30.800
In addition to that, it's an honor to collaborate with

47
00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:36.280
Michael to moderate business roundtables and document the insights from

48
00:02:36.319 --> 00:02:39.800
these roundtables as part of our book, Powerful Business Strategies.

49
00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:44.039
But please note that the views expressed on this show

50
00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:49.120
are personal views based on those successful interactions with business

51
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:52.479
owners through the roundtables and beyond. And my mission is

52
00:02:52.520 --> 00:02:56.240
a fearless moderator to ask the right questions to help you,

53
00:02:56.639 --> 00:03:01.120
the listener, learn the best strategies that the competition isn't doing.

54
00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:03.039
With that, back over to Michael.

55
00:03:03.439 --> 00:03:04.120
Thank you, Chikey.

56
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:07.479
So before we dive into today's crucial topic, I want

57
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:10.479
to share something that might change how you think about

58
00:03:10.680 --> 00:03:14.599
business success. So, every day you make hundreds of decisions,

59
00:03:14.599 --> 00:03:19.520
some small, some monumental. The quality of these decisions ultimately

60
00:03:19.520 --> 00:03:23.120
determines whether your business thrives or merely survives. And yet

61
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:28.719
most business owners struggle with decision making, cut between analysis,

62
00:03:28.759 --> 00:03:33.919
paralysis and hasty choices that they regret later. But here's

63
00:03:33.919 --> 00:03:37.120
what I've learned from working with successful business owners. Across

64
00:03:37.159 --> 00:03:41.400
dozens of industries. Great businesses aren't built by people who

65
00:03:41.520 --> 00:03:46.719
make perfect decisions. They're built by people who make good decisions,

66
00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:51.439
quickly and consistently. And today we're going to improve how

67
00:03:51.479 --> 00:03:55.039
you approach every business decision, from daily operations, strategy to

68
00:03:55.199 --> 00:03:59.240
strategic pivots. Because when you master the art and science

69
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:03.360
decision make, you don't just improve your business, you reclaim

70
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:08.919
control over your own destiny. So today we're tackling one

71
00:04:08.919 --> 00:04:12.159
of the most fundamental, yet overlooked aspects of business success,

72
00:04:12.960 --> 00:04:16.800
strategic decision making. And I want to start with a

73
00:04:17.160 --> 00:04:21.319
provocative statement. You see, most business owners are terrible at.

74
00:04:21.279 --> 00:04:26.120
Making decisions, not because they lack information, but because they

75
00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:29.079
have too much of it. We live in an era

76
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:30.360
of information overload.

77
00:04:30.519 --> 00:04:34.199
Business owners have access to more data, more metrics, more

78
00:04:34.240 --> 00:04:37.040
analysis tools, more expert opinions.

79
00:04:36.839 --> 00:04:38.319
Than any point in history.

80
00:04:39.199 --> 00:04:43.639
Yet paradoxically, this abundance of information often leads to worse

81
00:04:43.720 --> 00:04:50.560
decision making, not better. Why because people confuse information gathering

82
00:04:50.639 --> 00:04:53.079
with decision making. And I see this constantly in my

83
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:57.240
work with business owners, and I do it myself. We'll

84
00:04:57.279 --> 00:05:02.800
spend weeks analyzing it, the decision creating spreadsheets seeking multiple

85
00:05:02.839 --> 00:05:09.639
opinions and researching every possible angle. Meanwhile, our competitors are

86
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:13.480
making moves, opportunities are disappearing.

87
00:05:12.959 --> 00:05:16.120
And our teams are waiting for direction. By the time

88
00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:20.600
we finally make a decision, the optimal moment has often passed,

89
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:23.879
and none to share our quick story that illustrates this challenge.

90
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:28.160
So a manufacturing company spent four months deciding whether to

91
00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:31.600
purchase a piece of equipment that would improve their efficiency

92
00:05:31.600 --> 00:05:36.079
by twenty percent. They analyzed return on investment from every angle,

93
00:05:36.480 --> 00:05:39.639
solicited quotes from multiple vendors, help countless meetings.

94
00:05:40.279 --> 00:05:43.839
During those four months, they lost three major contracts because

95
00:05:43.839 --> 00:05:46.959
they couldn't meet capacity demands, and the cost of not

96
00:05:47.079 --> 00:05:52.600
deciding quickly was ten times greater than the cost of

97
00:05:52.639 --> 00:06:01.600
making the wrong equipment choice. So heat on understanding that

98
00:06:01.639 --> 00:06:05.519
there's a fundamental difference between decisions that benefit from extensive

99
00:06:05.519 --> 00:06:10.360
analysis and those that require quick action based on available

100
00:06:11.319 --> 00:06:14.639
available information. So hands out like distinguished between them. First,

101
00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:20.120
consider the reversibility of the decision. Amazon's Jeff Bezo calls

102
00:06:20.199 --> 00:06:24.639
these one way door versus two way door decisions.

103
00:06:25.560 --> 00:06:28.639
One way door doors.

104
00:06:28.399 --> 00:06:34.680
Are major, irreversible decisions that deserve careful attention, like you know,

105
00:06:34.759 --> 00:06:39.879
selling your company or completely changing your business model. Two

106
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:44.160
way door decisions are decisions that you can reverse or

107
00:06:44.240 --> 00:06:48.600
modify if new information emergence, like hiring somebody, launching a

108
00:06:48.759 --> 00:06:53.319
pilot program, or trying a new marketing channel. Most decisions

109
00:06:53.360 --> 00:06:56.279
are two way doors, yet we often treat them like

110
00:06:56.360 --> 00:07:00.079
one way doors where they're critical and irreversible, which creates

111
00:07:00.160 --> 00:07:04.759
unnecessary delay and missed opportunities. Second, you have to evaluate

112
00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:07.879
the cost of delay versus the cost of being wrong.

113
00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:12.160
In the manufacturing example, I mentioned the cost of delay

114
00:07:12.240 --> 00:07:16.319
that's lost contracts exceed the cause of making it sub

115
00:07:16.720 --> 00:07:21.040
optimal equipment trucks, and when delay costs are high, you

116
00:07:21.079 --> 00:07:27.040
need to decide within complete information correct assess whether additional

117
00:07:27.040 --> 00:07:32.319
information will meaningful immediately improve the decision quality. Often we

118
00:07:32.399 --> 00:07:36.000
gather more data to feel more confident, but the additional

119
00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:40.959
information doesn't actually change the optimal choice. If you've identified

120
00:07:41.000 --> 00:07:45.319
the key factors that have sufficient information to evaluate them

121
00:07:45.920 --> 00:07:50.720
or analysis rarely adds value and this leads to for

122
00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:55.040
me to introduce our Strategic Decision Framework which helps business

123
00:07:55.040 --> 00:08:00.319
owners consistently make better, faster decisions. And the framework has

124
00:08:00.439 --> 00:08:06.399
four key components. First, is decision velocity, developing the ability

125
00:08:06.519 --> 00:08:10.800
to make good decisions quickly when speed matters, and by

126
00:08:10.839 --> 00:08:16.959
the way, speed matters a lot. Second, information sufficiency, knowing

127
00:08:17.040 --> 00:08:21.000
when you have enough information to decide rather than seeking

128
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:22.000
perfect information.

129
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:24.800
Third risk assessment.

130
00:08:24.399 --> 00:08:29.120
Systematically evaluating potential outcomes to make confident choices under uncertainty.

131
00:08:30.040 --> 00:08:35.000
And then fourth, decision implementation is ensuring that decisions translate

132
00:08:35.519 --> 00:08:41.320
into effective action and results. See Most business owners excel

133
00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:43.879
in one or two of these areas but struggle in others.

134
00:08:43.919 --> 00:08:48.200
And the businesses that consistently outperform their competitors are those

135
00:08:48.240 --> 00:08:51.759
that master all four components, creating what I.

136
00:08:51.759 --> 00:08:54.919
Call a decision advantage, the ability to.

137
00:08:55.000 --> 00:09:00.879
Consistently make decisions faster than their competition. So so far

138
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:04.440
I introduced our strategic decision framework and the importance of

139
00:09:04.480 --> 00:09:08.600
developing a decision advantage over your competition. So now let's

140
00:09:08.679 --> 00:09:12.600
explore the first component of the framework, decision velocity. This

141
00:09:12.759 --> 00:09:16.919
is about developing the ability to make good decisions quickly

142
00:09:16.960 --> 00:09:20.679
when speed matters, without falling into the trap of impulsive

143
00:09:20.879 --> 00:09:26.039
or poorly considered choices. The first step in improving decision

144
00:09:26.159 --> 00:09:30.080
velocity is recognizing the different types of decisions you face

145
00:09:30.519 --> 00:09:35.559
and applying appropriate time frames to each. And I categorize

146
00:09:35.559 --> 00:09:39.080
business decisions into four types. So then these Type A

147
00:09:39.279 --> 00:09:43.240
decisions which are urgent and important. They require immediate action

148
00:09:43.759 --> 00:09:49.320
and have significant consequences. Examples include responding to a major

149
00:09:49.360 --> 00:09:53.360
customer complaint, or addressing a cash flow crisis, or reacting

150
00:09:53.399 --> 00:09:54.639
to a competitive threat.

151
00:09:54.679 --> 00:09:57.759
These are these decisions should be made within hours or

152
00:09:57.960 --> 00:10:01.440
days using a wrap bid response framework.

153
00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:05.480
Then there's type B decisions. These are decisions that are

154
00:10:05.519 --> 00:10:10.360
important but not urgent. They have significant long term consequences

155
00:10:10.360 --> 00:10:15.639
but don't require immediate action. Examples include strategic planning, major

156
00:10:15.639 --> 00:10:21.279
equipment purchases, or organizational restructure. These decisions deserve more analysis

157
00:10:21.799 --> 00:10:26.919
but should still have defined timelines, typically weeks rather than months.

158
00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:33.279
Type C decisions are urgent but not important. They require

159
00:10:33.559 --> 00:10:39.159
quick action but have limited consequences. Examples include routine vendor selections,

160
00:10:39.240 --> 00:10:43.679
maybe minor policy adjustments of administrative decisions. They should be

161
00:10:44.080 --> 00:10:49.000
delegated or decided quickly using established criteria. And then Type

162
00:10:49.080 --> 00:10:53.639
D those decisions are neither urgent nor important. There are

163
00:10:53.679 --> 00:10:58.720
often distractions actually that shouldn't consume significant time and mental energy,

164
00:10:58.759 --> 00:11:03.440
and examples might be things like you know the perfect

165
00:11:03.440 --> 00:11:08.519
logo design, or deciding on minor process optimizations or some

166
00:11:08.679 --> 00:11:12.399
non critical vendor negotiations. But the key insight is that

167
00:11:12.480 --> 00:11:15.080
most business owners spend too much time on type C

168
00:11:15.200 --> 00:11:20.399
and D decisions while procrastinating on type A and B decisions.

169
00:11:21.000 --> 00:11:24.960
High velocity decision makers flip this pattern. They make type

170
00:11:24.960 --> 00:11:30.240
A decisions immediately, set aggressive timeline so time B decisions,

171
00:11:30.679 --> 00:11:36.480
systemize type C decisions, and eliminate and defer type D decisions.

172
00:11:37.399 --> 00:11:41.240
So let me share a specific framework for accelerating type

173
00:11:41.279 --> 00:11:44.480
A decisions, which I call the Rapid Response Model.

174
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:47.480
Nice and rapid is a mnemonic.

175
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:53.799
OUR stands for recognize the decision point quickly. Don't let

176
00:11:53.960 --> 00:11:57.240
urgent issues fester while you hope they'll resolve themselves.

177
00:11:58.480 --> 00:11:59.440
A stands for.

178
00:12:01.720 --> 00:12:08.519
Assess available options using existing knowledge and immediately accessible accessible information,

179
00:12:08.879 --> 00:12:12.080
so don't watch it to any extensive research when quick

180
00:12:12.120 --> 00:12:17.279
actions needed. The P stands for picking the best available

181
00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:22.080
option based on current information. Perfect information isn't available in

182
00:12:22.200 --> 00:12:25.240
urgent situations, so you have to choose the option with

183
00:12:25.360 --> 00:12:32.000
the best risk adjusted outcome. I implement immediately with clear

184
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:37.559
steps and success criteria. A decision without action is worthless,

185
00:12:38.600 --> 00:12:44.639
and then d determined review points to assess results and

186
00:12:44.720 --> 00:12:49.279
adjust if necessary. Quick decisions can be refined based on feedback.

187
00:12:50.200 --> 00:12:53.600
So for type B decisions, I recommend the time boxed

188
00:12:53.600 --> 00:12:57.960
analysis approach. Set a specific deadline for the decision, typically

189
00:12:59.120 --> 00:13:02.679
two to four weeks from major choices, and then allocate

190
00:13:02.759 --> 00:13:08.559
your analysis time across the decision period rather than conducting

191
00:13:08.600 --> 00:13:13.879
open ended research. And this creates urgency while ensuring adequate consideration.

192
00:13:14.639 --> 00:13:18.840
Michael, that's a really systematic approach to different decision types.

193
00:13:19.080 --> 00:13:22.519
But look what about those situations though, Michael, you might

194
00:13:22.519 --> 00:13:24.639
sort of resonate with this, where a business owner feels

195
00:13:24.679 --> 00:13:26.399
like man, I just don't have the expertise or the

196
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:31.039
experience to make a quick decision. I mean, how should

197
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:32.919
they build confidence to really drive that.

198
00:13:33.799 --> 00:13:35.759
Well, that's crucial. You know.

199
00:13:35.840 --> 00:13:38.120
Lack of confidence is one of the biggest barriers to

200
00:13:38.200 --> 00:13:42.159
decision velocity, and many business owners delay decisions because they're

201
00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:44.159
afraid of making mistakes, especially.

202
00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:45.639
In areas where they feel less knowledgeable.

203
00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:51.039
So here are five strategies for building decision making confidence. First,

204
00:13:51.799 --> 00:13:56.559
develop decision making criteria in advance, so instead of evaluating

205
00:13:56.639 --> 00:14:02.039
every decision from scratch, creates standardiz its criteria for common

206
00:14:02.080 --> 00:14:02.840
decision types.

207
00:14:02.840 --> 00:14:04.600
For example, if you're if.

208
00:14:04.840 --> 00:14:11.919
You regularly evaluate new vendors, establish specific criteria around price, quality, reliability,

209
00:14:12.279 --> 00:14:15.399
and service, and when you need to make a vendor decision,

210
00:14:15.919 --> 00:14:19.399
you can quickly assess options against these predetermined factors rather

211
00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:24.879
than starting from ground zero. Second, implement the good enough principle.

212
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:30.200
Perfectionist business owners often delayed decisions seeking the optimal choice,

213
00:14:30.559 --> 00:14:33.879
when when a good choice would deliver eighty percent of

214
00:14:33.919 --> 00:14:40.240
the optimal outcome. In most business situations, a good decision

215
00:14:40.320 --> 00:14:49.600
implemented quickly outperforms a perfect decision implemented late, and the

216
00:14:49.679 --> 00:14:54.279
key is distinguishing between decisions where good enough is actually

217
00:14:54.320 --> 00:15:00.440
good enough versus decisions where optimization is crucial. Third, create

218
00:15:00.480 --> 00:15:05.559
decision templates for recurring choices. So many business decisions follow

219
00:15:05.879 --> 00:15:11.480
predictable patterns. By creating templates that outline key considerations, key

220
00:15:11.559 --> 00:15:16.840
information sources, and evaluation criteria, you can accelerate future decisions

221
00:15:17.120 --> 00:15:20.919
while ensuring you don't overlook important factors.

222
00:15:20.919 --> 00:15:22.000
So let me give you an example.

223
00:15:22.960 --> 00:15:25.759
So a business in the service industry created templates for

224
00:15:25.919 --> 00:15:30.279
hiring decisions as well as client onboarding and vendor selection.

225
00:15:31.039 --> 00:15:34.879
These templates reduced decision time by sixty percent while actually

226
00:15:34.879 --> 00:15:41.159
improving decision quality because they ensured themselves of consistent evaluation criteria.

227
00:15:41.240 --> 00:15:43.200
That's the big advantage of these templates.

228
00:15:43.879 --> 00:15:44.120
Four.

229
00:15:44.960 --> 00:15:48.360
Build advisory networks for specialized decisions. You don't need to

230
00:15:48.399 --> 00:15:51.919
be an expert in every area of business, but you do,

231
00:15:52.480 --> 00:15:56.799
but you should have rapid access to expert advice when needed.

232
00:15:56.799 --> 00:16:00.559
And this might include your CFO for financial decisions, attorney

233
00:16:00.559 --> 00:16:05.080
for legal issues, or industry peers for strategic choices. And

234
00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:10.159
the key is establishing these relationships before you need them

235
00:16:10.639 --> 00:16:13.440
and creating systems for rapid consultation.

236
00:16:14.879 --> 00:16:16.559
By the way, one of the one of the big.

237
00:16:16.360 --> 00:16:19.759
Areas I found was really great in terms of making

238
00:16:19.840 --> 00:16:26.559
quicker decisions was industry peers who are not competitive and

239
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:31.159
I've gotten more information from that group uh than anything

240
00:16:31.200 --> 00:16:33.559
that I've ever done any and it helped me not

241
00:16:33.600 --> 00:16:38.120
only make decisions, but improved process uh and help me

242
00:16:38.200 --> 00:16:41.720
with anything I was stumped with. But the key is

243
00:16:41.840 --> 00:16:45.639
establishing these relationships before you need them and creating systems

244
00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:51.360
for rapid consultation. And then fifth is practice rapid decision

245
00:16:51.399 --> 00:16:55.840
making on low stake choices like like any skill like,

246
00:16:55.960 --> 00:17:00.559
decision making improves with practice. You know, it's stop by

247
00:17:00.600 --> 00:17:03.679
making quick decisions on these low risk issues, which which

248
00:17:03.840 --> 00:17:07.000
like you know, what's yours for a business launch or

249
00:17:07.359 --> 00:17:12.000
what supplier for office supply, so which marketing channels to test?

250
00:17:12.119 --> 00:17:17.640
And this builds your decision making muscle without any significant consequences.

251
00:17:18.079 --> 00:17:19.680
So a manufacturing.

252
00:17:19.039 --> 00:17:23.880
Company company implemented this approach by designating quick decision Fridays.

253
00:17:23.920 --> 00:17:26.400
That's interesting, where they made.

254
00:17:26.319 --> 00:17:30.400
Rapid choices on minor decisions or minor issues that had

255
00:17:30.440 --> 00:17:33.279
been lingering. And this practice not only clear the decision

256
00:17:33.319 --> 00:17:37.279
making backlog, but also build team confidence and making faster

257
00:17:37.440 --> 00:17:39.240
choices on more important matters.

258
00:17:39.519 --> 00:17:42.599
You know, those are excellent strategies for building confidence, Michael,

259
00:17:42.680 --> 00:17:46.119
But what about those decisions doing that involve multiple stakeholders

260
00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:48.880
right where it requires a little bit of buying from

261
00:17:48.920 --> 00:17:51.839
the team. I mean, how can business owners approach and

262
00:17:51.960 --> 00:17:52.759
accelerate that?

263
00:17:53.559 --> 00:17:54.720
Well, that's a good question too.

264
00:17:55.240 --> 00:17:59.599
You know, multiple stakeholders decisions are often the slowest because

265
00:17:59.599 --> 00:18:06.400
they coordination, multiple perspectives and consensus building. However, there are

266
00:18:06.480 --> 00:18:11.119
specific techniques to accelerate these decisions without sacrificing quality or

267
00:18:11.200 --> 00:18:16.039
team buy in. First, use the what I call the

268
00:18:16.039 --> 00:18:21.680
Iraqi framework RACI to clarified decision rolls up front and

269
00:18:21.960 --> 00:18:25.720
rac wid stance are responsible which means who will implement it,

270
00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:33.000
Accountable which means who has the final decision authority, consultant

271
00:18:33.319 --> 00:18:37.400
which means who provides the input, and informed who needs

272
00:18:37.440 --> 00:18:41.279
to know the outcome. And most slow decisions results from

273
00:18:41.440 --> 00:18:44.519
unclear roles because everyone thinks they have veto power or

274
00:18:44.559 --> 00:18:48.440
equal decision authority. And by clarifying these roles at the beginning,

275
00:18:49.240 --> 00:18:53.759
you can actually gather input efficiency while maintaining clear decision authority.

276
00:18:53.799 --> 00:18:59.039
For example, the economical person might gather input from consultant,

277
00:18:59.480 --> 00:19:03.880
consultant stakeholders over three days, then make a final decision

278
00:19:03.920 --> 00:19:04.519
by Friday.

279
00:19:05.519 --> 00:19:08.319
Second, implement time.

280
00:19:08.160 --> 00:19:13.880
Boxed consultation for gathering stakeholder input instead of open ended

281
00:19:13.920 --> 00:19:18.519
discussion periods. Set specific timelines for input gather For example,

282
00:19:19.559 --> 00:19:22.160
we need your feedback on this proposal by Tuesday and

283
00:19:22.279 --> 00:19:25.200
five pm after that, we'll make a decision based on

284
00:19:25.240 --> 00:19:31.519
available input. This approach respects stakeholders' perspectives while preventing endless

285
00:19:31.559 --> 00:19:37.440
discussion cycles that delay decision making. Third, use consent based

286
00:19:37.640 --> 00:19:42.920
rather than consensus based decision making. Consensus requires everyone to

287
00:19:43.079 --> 00:19:46.319
enthusiastically agree, which is often impossible and always slow.

288
00:19:48.160 --> 00:19:50.880
Requires that no one has fundamental.

289
00:19:50.240 --> 00:19:54.680
Objections to moving forward, which is much more achievable. The

290
00:19:54.799 --> 00:19:59.160
question shifts from does everyone love this option too? Can

291
00:19:59.200 --> 00:20:04.759
everyone live with this option? This subtle change dramatically accelerates

292
00:20:05.279 --> 00:20:12.799
multi stakeholder decisions. Fourth, separate information gathering from decision making meetings.

293
00:20:12.839 --> 00:20:16.640
Many meetings try to accomplish both education and decision making

294
00:20:16.720 --> 00:20:22.640
in the same session, which leads to lengthy, unfocused discussions. Instead,

295
00:20:23.920 --> 00:20:28.200
share information in advance and use meeting time exclusively for

296
00:20:28.359 --> 00:20:31.279
discussion and decision making.

297
00:20:31.759 --> 00:20:33.799
For example, send.

298
00:20:33.559 --> 00:20:36.160
Background materials three days before the meeting with a clear

299
00:20:36.200 --> 00:20:38.920
agenda focused on the specific decision to be made, and

300
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:43.319
this allows participants to come prepared and use meeting time efficiently.

301
00:20:44.279 --> 00:20:50.000
Fifth is implement silent brainstorming for complex group decisions.

302
00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:51.160
So when groups.

303
00:20:51.319 --> 00:20:56.400
Discuss options verbally, the first ideas often anchor subsequent discussion,

304
00:20:56.480 --> 00:21:02.920
limiting creative alternatives. Silent brainstorm allows everyone to generate ideas

305
00:21:03.000 --> 00:21:07.319
independently before group discussion. So a client used this approach

306
00:21:07.359 --> 00:21:11.680
for strategic planning decisions, and instead of starting with verbal discussion,

307
00:21:12.240 --> 00:21:16.680
they gave each participant five minutes to silently write down

308
00:21:16.680 --> 00:21:19.279
their top three recommendations. So when they collected all the

309
00:21:19.319 --> 00:21:24.039
ideas before beginning group evaluation, this process generated forty percent

310
00:21:24.119 --> 00:21:29.119
more viable alternatives than their previous approach while reducing meeting

311
00:21:29.200 --> 00:21:30.640
time by fifty percent.

312
00:21:31.119 --> 00:21:34.400
Yeah, those are really practical techniques. Michael so wrop up

313
00:21:34.400 --> 00:21:37.000
this segment. What are two action items for business owners?

314
00:21:38.240 --> 00:21:42.599
Well, the first item is to categorize all decisions using

315
00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:46.319
our type A through DE framework and then set specific

316
00:21:47.039 --> 00:21:47.759
deadlines for.

317
00:21:47.759 --> 00:21:50.039
Each decision based on its type.

318
00:21:50.240 --> 00:21:53.160
So Type A decision should have deadlines within forty eight hours,

319
00:21:53.480 --> 00:21:56.160
Type B decisions should have deadlines within two to four weeks.

320
00:21:56.160 --> 00:21:58.480
Type SEED decisions should be resolved within a week or

321
00:21:58.480 --> 00:22:05.200
delegated entirely. And this simple categorization will immediately accelerate your

322
00:22:05.319 --> 00:22:09.720
decision making. The second action item is to implement the

323
00:22:09.759 --> 00:22:13.519
Bracci framework for your next multi stakeholder decision, and so

324
00:22:13.640 --> 00:22:19.880
before gathering any input, clearly define who is responsible for implementation,

325
00:22:19.960 --> 00:22:22.640
who's accountable for the final decision, and who should be

326
00:22:22.680 --> 00:22:26.000
consulted for input and then finally who needs to be

327
00:22:26.079 --> 00:22:29.799
informed of the outcome. Share these roles with the participants

328
00:22:29.880 --> 00:22:34.160
up front, then stick to the defined decision timeline and

329
00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:38.640
this will prevent the role confusion that slows down most

330
00:22:38.680 --> 00:22:42.359
group decisions. And so on our next segment, we'll explore

331
00:22:42.440 --> 00:22:46.920
information sufficiency, how to determine when you have enough information

332
00:22:47.000 --> 00:22:51.440
to make a decision, rather than endlessly seeking perfect information

333
00:22:51.559 --> 00:22:55.640
that doesn't exist. So before I continue this discussion, let's

334
00:22:55.680 --> 00:22:59.680
take a ninety second break. Hey, dear business owners, let

335
00:22:59.680 --> 00:23:02.640
me ask something. Are you tied of blending in with

336
00:23:02.720 --> 00:23:06.519
your competitors? Frustrated with slow growth and slim margins?

337
00:23:06.839 --> 00:23:08.200
Well, I've got news for you.

338
00:23:08.920 --> 00:23:12.480
Everything you've ever learned about growing your business is wrong.

339
00:23:13.279 --> 00:23:15.440
Don't worry. I'm here to let you in.

340
00:23:15.359 --> 00:23:19.400
On a secret weapon, your position of market dominance. It's

341
00:23:19.400 --> 00:23:23.160
what sets you apart, makes you irreplaceable, and has customers

342
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:26.319
lining up at your door. My name is Michael barber

343
00:23:26.359 --> 00:23:29.720
Rita from Next Step CFO. I know what you're thinking.

344
00:23:30.400 --> 00:23:33.319
Sounds great, Michael, How do I find my position of

345
00:23:33.359 --> 00:23:37.039
market dominance? Well, that's exactly why we've created our game

346
00:23:37.119 --> 00:23:41.119
changing impleventation program called Next Step to Market Dominance.

347
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:43.880
In just ninety days, we'll guide you step.

348
00:23:43.640 --> 00:23:46.640
By step to a position of market dominance by uncovering

349
00:23:46.680 --> 00:23:50.240
your unique strengths that competitors can't touch. By crafting a

350
00:23:50.240 --> 00:23:53.960
message that resonates deeply with your ideal customer. By building

351
00:23:53.960 --> 00:23:55.920
a strategy that turns you into.

352
00:23:55.680 --> 00:23:58.480
The go to expert in your field. Now this is

353
00:23:58.519 --> 00:23:59.039
in theory.

354
00:23:59.640 --> 00:24:02.480
These are battle test and strategies that have held businesses

355
00:24:02.559 --> 00:24:07.160
like yours double, triple and quadruple their revenue. Don't let

356
00:24:07.200 --> 00:24:10.359
another quarter go by struggling to standout. It's time to

357
00:24:10.440 --> 00:24:15.680
dominate your market period. Go to NEXTSTEPCFO dot net forward

358
00:24:15.680 --> 00:24:19.119
slash contact. Fill out the form and in the message

359
00:24:19.160 --> 00:24:23.200
section put the word dominate or call us at seven

360
00:24:23.240 --> 00:24:26.839
eight one three two six three A two two. That's

361
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:30.599
next step CFO dot net forward slash contact or call

362
00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:33.880
us at seven eight one three two six three A

363
00:24:34.000 --> 00:24:34.400
two two.

364
00:24:35.559 --> 00:24:37.559
Welcome back to Powerful Business Strategies.

365
00:24:37.599 --> 00:24:40.240
And remember you can go to Powerful Business Strategies dot

366
00:24:40.279 --> 00:24:45.440
com to catch any of our replays. So before the break,

367
00:24:45.680 --> 00:24:49.359
we discussed decision velocity, how to make good decisions quickly

368
00:24:49.400 --> 00:24:53.920
when speed matters. Now let's explore the second component of

369
00:24:53.920 --> 00:24:59.759
our strategic decision framework called information sufficiency. So this is

370
00:24:59.759 --> 00:25:02.799
a knowing when you have enough information to make a

371
00:25:02.839 --> 00:25:08.759
decision rather than endlessly seeking perfect information that usually doesn't exist.

372
00:25:09.640 --> 00:25:13.839
Information sufficiency is perhaps the most challenging aspect of decision

373
00:25:13.880 --> 00:25:20.039
making because it requires accepting uncertainty and acting with incomplete knowledge.

374
00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:24.920
The fundamental principle here is that perfect information is really available,

375
00:25:24.960 --> 00:25:28.000
and even when it is, the cost of attaining it

376
00:25:28.400 --> 00:25:32.799
often exceeds its value, and the goal is to eliminate uncertainty.

377
00:25:32.839 --> 00:25:37.000
It's to reduce uncertainty to an acceptable level. Given the

378
00:25:37.039 --> 00:25:42.079
decisions important the decisions importance and time constraints. So let

379
00:25:42.119 --> 00:25:48.759
me walk you through a systematic approach determining information sufficiency. First,

380
00:25:48.960 --> 00:25:53.559
identify the critical information requirements for your decision, and these

381
00:25:53.599 --> 00:25:57.200
are the key factors that would generally change the decision

382
00:25:57.720 --> 00:26:01.400
if you knew them with certainty. For most business decisions,

383
00:26:01.440 --> 00:26:06.599
there's only three to five truly critical factors, and sometimes less.

384
00:26:07.880 --> 00:26:11.759
But for example, when deciding whether to hire a new employee,

385
00:26:11.799 --> 00:26:14.759
the critical factors might be their ability to perform their

386
00:26:14.759 --> 00:26:19.279
core job functions, their cultural fit with the team, their

387
00:26:19.400 --> 00:26:23.359
salary expectations relative to their budget, and their availability to

388
00:26:23.400 --> 00:26:28.240
start within your timeline. Factors like their alma mater, previous

389
00:26:28.319 --> 00:26:33.440
job titles or personality preferences are interesting but really change

390
00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:38.559
the hiring decision. Second, assests the current confidence level on

391
00:26:38.680 --> 00:26:43.000
each critical factor using a simple scale. High confidence is

392
00:26:43.079 --> 00:26:45.960
eighty to one hundred percent certain, Medium confidence is fifty

393
00:26:45.960 --> 00:26:49.000
to seventy nine percent certain, or low confidence is below

394
00:26:49.039 --> 00:26:53.599
fifty percent. The goal is to achieve high confidence on

395
00:26:53.720 --> 00:26:59.160
every factor. It's to understand where your uncertainty lives. Third,

396
00:26:59.440 --> 00:27:03.759
determine the minimum confidence threshold needed for the decision based

397
00:27:03.799 --> 00:27:10.720
on its reversibility and importance. For irreversibility high impact decisions

398
00:27:11.000 --> 00:27:14.279
might you might need high confidence on most critical factors.

399
00:27:14.279 --> 00:27:15.519
For reversal.

400
00:27:16.799 --> 00:27:22.680
Lower impact decisions, medium confidence might be sufficient. Fourth, identify

401
00:27:23.119 --> 00:27:26.839
what additional information would move you from your current confidence

402
00:27:26.920 --> 00:27:30.279
level to your minimum threshold and access to cost and

403
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:35.160
time required to obtain it. Often, this analysis reveals that

404
00:27:35.200 --> 00:27:39.279
the additional information needed is either impossible to obtain or

405
00:27:39.440 --> 00:27:42.440
would cause more than its value. So let me share

406
00:27:42.480 --> 00:27:44.920
an example of this framework and action. So our company

407
00:27:45.559 --> 00:27:50.599
was considering expanding into a new geographic market, a significant

408
00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:57.599
investment requiring careful analysis. Now they identify five critical factors

409
00:27:57.680 --> 00:28:05.319
market size, competitive intensity, customer acquisition costs, operational complexity, and

410
00:28:05.599 --> 00:28:12.319
regulatory requirements, and their initial confident levels were regarding market

411
00:28:12.400 --> 00:28:19.440
size high confidence, competitive intensity medium confidence, customer acquisition costs

412
00:28:19.559 --> 00:28:26.000
low confidence, operational complexity medium confidence, and regulatory requirements high confidence.

413
00:28:26.839 --> 00:28:30.440
For this major expansion decision, they needed high confidence on

414
00:28:30.480 --> 00:28:33.759
at least four of the five factors, and the only

415
00:28:33.920 --> 00:28:39.079
area needing additional research was customer acquisition costs. So rather

416
00:28:39.160 --> 00:28:43.640
than conducting exhaust of market research, they designed a small

417
00:28:43.720 --> 00:28:47.880
pilot program in the tile in the target market to

418
00:28:48.079 --> 00:28:53.640
test customer acquisition costs directly, and this approach provided the

419
00:28:54.440 --> 00:28:57.920
needed information in two months at a fraction of the.

420
00:28:57.920 --> 00:29:00.119
Cost of traditional market research.

421
00:29:00.680 --> 00:29:04.640
That seems like a very logical approach to information gathering, Michael.

422
00:29:04.680 --> 00:29:07.279
But what about those situations though, where business owners they

423
00:29:07.480 --> 00:29:11.000
just feel the pressure right to analyze everything with like

424
00:29:11.119 --> 00:29:14.839
minute details and really thoroughly, either from internal teams or

425
00:29:14.920 --> 00:29:17.920
external advisors. I mean, how do they balance that sort

426
00:29:17.920 --> 00:29:20.920
of level of thorough analysis with efficiency.

427
00:29:21.680 --> 00:29:24.519
Yeah, Well, the pressure for exhaustive analysis often comes from

428
00:29:24.640 --> 00:29:28.599
risk aversion and the misconception that more analysis always leads

429
00:29:28.640 --> 00:29:29.519
to Betett.

430
00:29:29.119 --> 00:29:30.400
Decisions, which it doesn't.

431
00:29:30.680 --> 00:29:34.960
Yeah, So in reality, there's often an inverse relationship between

432
00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:39.519
analysis time and decision quality after a certain point. And

433
00:29:39.599 --> 00:29:44.039
here are five strategies for balancing thoroughness with efficiency. So first,

434
00:29:44.599 --> 00:29:49.000
establish analysis budgets for different decision types. Just as your

435
00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:54.200
budget money for various expenses, budget time for analysis based

436
00:29:54.240 --> 00:29:57.400
on the decisions important and reversibility. For example, you might

437
00:29:57.440 --> 00:30:01.279
allocate two hours for routines better decision, two days for

438
00:30:01.400 --> 00:30:05.160
hiring decisions, in two weeks for major strategic choices. And

439
00:30:05.200 --> 00:30:08.839
when you reach your analysis budget, you must decide with

440
00:30:09.640 --> 00:30:15.920
available information unless extraordinary circumstances justify additional investment, and this

441
00:30:15.960 --> 00:30:21.839
prevents analysis from expanding to fill available time. Second, use

442
00:30:21.880 --> 00:30:25.319
the eighty twenty row and use it for gathering information.

443
00:30:25.440 --> 00:30:28.359
So research shows that the first twenty percent of analysis

444
00:30:28.400 --> 00:30:32.400
time typically generates eighty percent of the valuable insights. The

445
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:36.759
remaining eighty percent of analysis time often diminishes the returns.

446
00:30:36.799 --> 00:30:41.119
So once you've identified the major factors and primary alternatives,

447
00:30:41.400 --> 00:30:47.039
additional analysis really changes the optimal decision. Third, implement pre

448
00:30:47.160 --> 00:30:50.920
mortem so to satisfy the need for.

449
00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:53.720
Risk analysis without endless scenario planning.

450
00:30:53.759 --> 00:30:59.119
So a pre mortem actually involves imagining that your preferred

451
00:30:59.119 --> 00:31:03.359
decision is fail and working backward to identifying what.

452
00:31:03.200 --> 00:31:03.880
Has gone wrong.

453
00:31:04.720 --> 00:31:10.279
This exercise SF This exercise surface important risks in thirty

454
00:31:10.279 --> 00:31:14.200
minutes rather than weeks of exhaust of analysis. Let me

455
00:31:14.240 --> 00:31:16.880
give you an example. If you're considering a new product launch,

456
00:31:17.400 --> 00:31:20.359
spend thirty minutes brainstorming all the ways it could fail,

457
00:31:21.160 --> 00:31:26.240
whether it's insufficient demand, production problems, competitive response. Then assess

458
00:31:26.359 --> 00:31:31.039
which risks are most likely and develop migration strategies for

459
00:31:31.079 --> 00:31:36.640
the most critical ones. Four distinguished between analysis and preparation

460
00:31:36.759 --> 00:31:41.599
when facing pressures for thoroughness, often because often when asked,

461
00:31:41.640 --> 00:31:45.000
when people ask for more analysis, they're actually asking for

462
00:31:45.079 --> 00:31:49.759
better preparation and implementation planning. So instead of analyzing decision

463
00:31:49.839 --> 00:31:52.319
more focus on planning its execution.

464
00:31:54.000 --> 00:31:57.000
So let me give you that. For instance, if someone

465
00:31:57.319 --> 00:31:59.960
questions a hiring decision by saying we need to analy

466
00:32:00.279 --> 00:32:05.440
this more, ask specifically what information would change the decision.

467
00:32:06.160 --> 00:32:10.359
Often their real concern is about onboarding, training or performance

468
00:32:10.400 --> 00:32:16.839
management and implementation issues, not decision making issues.

469
00:32:17.160 --> 00:32:17.599
Interesting.

470
00:32:19.119 --> 00:32:25.799
Fifth, create decision forcing events to prevent analysis paralysis. These

471
00:32:25.839 --> 00:32:31.279
are artificial deadlines that require a decision by a specific date,

472
00:32:32.079 --> 00:32:33.960
regardless of information available.

473
00:32:34.000 --> 00:32:36.440
So sometimes the pressure of a deadline reveals that you

474
00:32:36.559 --> 00:32:38.160
actually have sufficient.

475
00:32:37.680 --> 00:32:38.960
Information to decide.

476
00:32:40.319 --> 00:32:45.960
Client struggling with technology investment decisions implemented monthly technology decision

477
00:32:46.039 --> 00:32:51.200
days where all pending tech decisions had to be resolved.

478
00:32:51.680 --> 00:32:55.720
This artificial constraint forced them to recognize that they really

479
00:32:55.799 --> 00:32:59.200
needed more information and they needed to commit to a

480
00:32:59.279 --> 00:33:00.480
choice forward.

481
00:33:01.119 --> 00:33:02.759
So Michael, look, I mean we're getting a lot of

482
00:33:02.799 --> 00:33:06.440
head nods with some of the insights so far, but

483
00:33:06.519 --> 00:33:10.359
there's some skeptics, right, I mean, look, how would a

484
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:13.920
business owner handle those situations where they do actually realize

485
00:33:14.119 --> 00:33:16.880
that after making a decision, they probably should have gathered

486
00:33:16.920 --> 00:33:17.559
more information.

487
00:33:18.880 --> 00:33:20.200
Well, that's a thoughtful question.

488
00:33:21.440 --> 00:33:24.720
Learning from decision outcomes is crucial for improving judgment, but

489
00:33:25.759 --> 00:33:29.720
many business owners draw the wrong lessons from their experience.

490
00:33:29.880 --> 00:33:36.200
The key is distinguishing between poor decision process and poor

491
00:33:36.279 --> 00:33:41.720
outcomes due to uncertainty. And here's a framework for productive

492
00:33:42.039 --> 00:33:47.799
decision learning. First, separate decision quality from outcome quality. So

493
00:33:47.839 --> 00:33:50.240
a good decision can have a poor outcome due to

494
00:33:50.480 --> 00:33:54.920
unpredictable factors, and a poor decision can have good outcome

495
00:33:55.000 --> 00:33:58.920
due to luck. So focus on evaluating your decision process,

496
00:33:59.039 --> 00:34:02.599
not just the result. Ask questions like did I identify

497
00:34:02.640 --> 00:34:06.920
the right critical factors? Did I gather appropriate information given

498
00:34:06.960 --> 00:34:11.239
the time constraints, and did I consider reasonable alternatives?

499
00:34:11.320 --> 00:34:14.039
Was the information sufficiency assessment accurate?

500
00:34:15.320 --> 00:34:21.960
So Second, conduct decision autopsies on important choices regardless of outcome.

501
00:34:22.639 --> 00:34:26.679
Schedule these interviews three to six months after major decisions

502
00:34:26.679 --> 00:34:30.079
to assess both the decision process and the results because

503
00:34:30.119 --> 00:34:34.800
this timing allows enough experience to evaluate the outcomes while

504
00:34:34.840 --> 00:34:39.159
keeping the decision process fresh in your memory. And during

505
00:34:39.199 --> 00:34:44.400
these autopsies, examine what information proved most valuable, what information

506
00:34:44.519 --> 00:34:47.960
proved totally irrelevant, and what factors did we consider that

507
00:34:48.119 --> 00:34:50.719
turned out to be important and how can we improve

508
00:34:50.760 --> 00:34:53.000
our process for similar decisions in the future.

509
00:34:53.039 --> 00:34:54.239
That's a great process.

510
00:34:54.880 --> 00:34:58.880
And then third, track your information accuracy over time. Keep

511
00:34:58.960 --> 00:35:02.519
simple records of your confidence levels on critical factors and

512
00:35:02.639 --> 00:35:06.280
how accurate those assessments prove to be. And this builds calibration,

513
00:35:06.920 --> 00:35:12.320
the ability to accurately assess your own uncertainty. And as

514
00:35:12.360 --> 00:35:15.719
an example, if you consistently overestimate your confidence and market

515
00:35:15.760 --> 00:35:19.519
demand projections, you'll learn to either gather more information in

516
00:35:19.559 --> 00:35:21.880
this area or account for this bias in the future.

517
00:35:23.239 --> 00:35:26.400
Cool focus on improving.

518
00:35:26.000 --> 00:35:31.000
Systematic biases rather than individual decision mistakes.

519
00:35:31.559 --> 00:35:35.760
Everyone makes poor decision decisions occasionally, you know, due to

520
00:35:35.840 --> 00:35:39.920
incomplete information of maybe even unforeseen circumstances, which certainly happens.

521
00:35:40.559 --> 00:35:44.599
The goal is identifying patterns in your own decision making

522
00:35:44.639 --> 00:35:49.360
that can be improved. So common systematic biases include overconfidence

523
00:35:49.360 --> 00:35:55.840
and familiar areas, underestimating implementation challenges, anchoring on initial information,

524
00:35:56.400 --> 00:36:01.840
or avoiding decisions that require uncomfortable conversations. Celebrat a good

525
00:36:01.880 --> 00:36:07.480
decision process even when outcomes are poor. This reinforces the

526
00:36:07.480 --> 00:36:11.079
behavior you want to continue and prevents over correction based

527
00:36:11.079 --> 00:36:14.400
on unlucky outcomes. And if you made a sound decision

528
00:36:14.440 --> 00:36:19.280
with appropriate information and reasonable analysis, the process was correct

529
00:36:19.559 --> 00:36:25.679
even with even if external factors created poor results. Let

530
00:36:25.719 --> 00:36:28.639
me give you a quick example. A manufacturing company implemented

531
00:36:28.639 --> 00:36:29.719
this approach.

532
00:36:29.639 --> 00:36:32.519
After a failed product launch, and instead of concluding that

533
00:36:32.559 --> 00:36:36.559
they needed more market research which would slow future decisions,

534
00:36:36.559 --> 00:36:39.920
they recognized that their market analysis was actually quite good

535
00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:44.199
and their failure resulted from implementation challenges that they couldn't

536
00:36:44.199 --> 00:36:48.920
have predicted. This insight led them to focus on implementation

537
00:36:49.079 --> 00:36:53.159
planning rather than analysis paralysis for future launches.

538
00:36:53.239 --> 00:36:54.000
And then the key.

539
00:36:53.880 --> 00:36:57.960
Insight is that perfect decisions don't exist, but you can

540
00:36:58.039 --> 00:37:01.719
consistently improve your decision making process by learning the right

541
00:37:01.800 --> 00:37:05.639
lessons from both successes and failures.

542
00:37:05.960 --> 00:37:08.599
Michael, are you saying perfection and business is overrated? Is

543
00:37:08.599 --> 00:37:10.480
that when I hear you saying, hey go, you can

544
00:37:10.559 --> 00:37:14.960
just take up a really balanced approach out to learning

545
00:37:15.039 --> 00:37:18.679
from decisions. To wrop up this segment, what are two

546
00:37:18.800 --> 00:37:20.599
key action items for business owners?

547
00:37:21.119 --> 00:37:23.679
Well, the first one, Triokey, is to implement the critical

548
00:37:23.679 --> 00:37:27.760
information requirements analysis for your next important decision. So, before

549
00:37:27.800 --> 00:37:30.800
gathering and for information, write down the three to five

550
00:37:30.920 --> 00:37:34.320
factors that would generally change the decision if you knew

551
00:37:34.320 --> 00:37:35.239
them with certainty.

552
00:37:35.639 --> 00:37:38.480
Then as set your current confidence.

553
00:37:38.119 --> 00:37:42.199
Level on each factor and determine the minimum confidence level

554
00:37:42.239 --> 00:37:45.079
you need to proceed. And this exercise will prevent you

555
00:37:45.119 --> 00:37:50.559
from gathering interesting but irrelevant information and help you focus

556
00:37:50.639 --> 00:37:53.559
on what truly matters. And so the second item is

557
00:37:53.639 --> 00:37:57.519
to establish analysis budgets for your most common decision types.

558
00:37:58.000 --> 00:38:03.079
Spend thirty minutes creating time limits for routine decisions, perhaps

559
00:38:03.119 --> 00:38:05.719
one hour of for vendor selections, four hours for hiring,

560
00:38:06.079 --> 00:38:08.920
and one week for strategic initiatives and then commit to

561
00:38:08.960 --> 00:38:11.920
to siding within these budgets.

562
00:38:12.960 --> 00:38:14.719
Then commit to to siding within these.

563
00:38:14.599 --> 00:38:20.039
Budgets unless you can specifically identify critical information that would

564
00:38:20.159 --> 00:38:23.760
change the decision and can be obtained efficiently. And this

565
00:38:23.800 --> 00:38:28.119
will prevent analysis from expanding indefinitely and force you to

566
00:38:28.159 --> 00:38:32.519
work with sufficient rather than perfect information. And in the

567
00:38:32.599 --> 00:38:38.840
next segment, we'll explore risk assessment, how to systematically evaluate

568
00:38:39.280 --> 00:38:43.000
potential outcomes so that you can make confident choices even

569
00:38:43.440 --> 00:38:47.079
under uncertainty. So before I continue this discussion, let's take

570
00:38:47.079 --> 00:38:50.440
a ninety second break. Hey, their business owners, let me

571
00:38:50.440 --> 00:38:53.239
ask you something. Are you tied of blending in with

572
00:38:53.320 --> 00:38:57.199
your competitors? Frustrated with slow growth and slim margins?

573
00:38:57.440 --> 00:39:00.280
Well, I've got news for you. Anything you have.

574
00:39:00.360 --> 00:39:05.199
Learned about growing your business is wrong. Don't worry. I'm

575
00:39:05.239 --> 00:39:07.559
here to let you in on a secret weapon. Your

576
00:39:07.599 --> 00:39:11.280
position of market dominance. It's what sets you apart, makes

577
00:39:11.320 --> 00:39:14.880
you irreplaceable, and has customers lining up at your door.

578
00:39:15.880 --> 00:39:19.519
My name is Michael Babarta from Next Step CFO. I

579
00:39:19.599 --> 00:39:22.800
know what you're thinking. Sounds great, Michael, How do I

580
00:39:22.880 --> 00:39:26.679
find my position of market dominance? Well, that's exactly why

581
00:39:26.679 --> 00:39:30.599
we've created our game changing impleitation program called Next Step

582
00:39:30.639 --> 00:39:33.920
to Market Dominance. In just ninety days, we'll guide you

583
00:39:33.960 --> 00:39:36.719
step by step to a position of market dominance by

584
00:39:36.800 --> 00:39:40.760
uncovering your unique strengths that competitors can't touch. By crafting

585
00:39:40.760 --> 00:39:44.159
a message that resonates deeply with your ideal customer, by

586
00:39:44.199 --> 00:39:46.760
building a strategy that turns you into the go to

587
00:39:46.920 --> 00:39:47.920
expert in your field.

588
00:39:48.599 --> 00:39:49.639
Now this is in theory.

589
00:39:50.280 --> 00:39:53.239
These are battle tested strategies that have helped businesses like

590
00:39:53.280 --> 00:39:57.760
you as double, triple and quadruple their revenue. Don't let

591
00:39:57.800 --> 00:40:00.000
another quarter go by struggling to stand down.

592
00:40:00.239 --> 00:40:03.199
It's time to dominate your market. Period.

593
00:40:03.840 --> 00:40:08.159
Go to NEXTSTEPCFO dot net forward slash contact. Fill out

594
00:40:08.159 --> 00:40:11.199
the form and in the message section put the word

595
00:40:11.480 --> 00:40:15.159
dominate or call us at seven eight one three two

596
00:40:15.239 --> 00:40:18.880
six three A two two. That's next step CFO dot

597
00:40:18.960 --> 00:40:22.199
net forward slash Contact or call us at seven eight

598
00:40:22.280 --> 00:40:25.000
one three two six three A two two.

599
00:40:25.800 --> 00:40:28.679
So welcome back to Powerful Business Strategies. And remember you.

600
00:40:28.599 --> 00:40:32.719
Could catch any recording at Powerful Business Strategies dot com.

601
00:40:33.199 --> 00:40:37.039
So so far we've covered decision velocity and information sufficiency.

602
00:40:37.079 --> 00:40:39.840
Now let's explore the third component of our strategic decision

603
00:40:39.880 --> 00:40:45.000
framework risk assessment, and this is about systematically evaluating potential

604
00:40:45.039 --> 00:40:49.320
outcomes so that you can make confident choices under uncertainty.

605
00:40:49.320 --> 00:40:54.039
And most business owners ignore either if they either ignore

606
00:40:54.119 --> 00:40:58.760
risk entirely, leading to reckless decisions or become paralyzed by

607
00:40:58.880 --> 00:41:00.920
risk leading to miss opportunities.

608
00:41:01.440 --> 00:41:03.480
Effective risk assessment finds.

609
00:41:03.199 --> 00:41:08.639
That middle ground acknowledging uncertainty while making decisions that optimize

610
00:41:09.000 --> 00:41:13.159
risk adjusted returns, and the foundation of effective risk assessment

611
00:41:13.239 --> 00:41:17.800
is understanding the risk and uncertainty. Understanding that risk and

612
00:41:17.920 --> 00:41:23.039
uncertainty on different concepts. Risks refer to situations where you

613
00:41:23.079 --> 00:41:27.280
can estimate the probability of different outcomes. Uncertainty, on the

614
00:41:27.280 --> 00:41:31.719
other hand, refers to situations where you can't reliably estimate probabilities.

615
00:41:32.760 --> 00:41:37.360
Most business decisions involve uncertainty, not just risk, which means

616
00:41:37.400 --> 00:41:42.159
traditional risk analysis tools when they often don't apply. So instead,

617
00:41:42.280 --> 00:41:46.440
I recommend a practical approach I call scenario based risk

618
00:41:46.519 --> 00:41:49.360
assessment that works well in their uncertainty. And here's how

619
00:41:49.360 --> 00:41:53.559
it works. First, identify the primary ways your business could

620
00:41:53.679 --> 00:41:57.239
either succeed or fail. Don't try to enumerate every possible

621
00:41:57.280 --> 00:42:00.599
outcome focus on the three to four most likely scenarios

622
00:42:00.599 --> 00:42:04.280
that would represent different levels of success or failure. For example,

623
00:42:04.639 --> 00:42:07.320
you're considering a new product launch. Your scenarios might be

624
00:42:07.440 --> 00:42:11.840
strong success, which exceeds sales projections by twenty percent, moderate

625
00:42:11.880 --> 00:42:16.280
success which meets the sales projections, disappointing performance which achieves

626
00:42:16.639 --> 00:42:20.039
fifty to eighty percent of projections, or clear failure, which

627
00:42:20.079 --> 00:42:25.199
achieves less than fifty percent projections. And second, estimate the

628
00:42:25.320 --> 00:42:30.039
approximate probability of each scenario. You don't need precise probabilities,

629
00:42:30.079 --> 00:42:33.599
but you should have a strong sense of likelihood. You

630
00:42:33.679 --> 00:42:37.239
might estimate strong success at twenty percent, moderate success at

631
00:42:37.239 --> 00:42:41.079
forty percent, disappointing performance at thirty percent, and clear failure

632
00:42:41.119 --> 00:42:46.280
at ten percent. Third, calculate the financial and strategic impact

633
00:42:46.360 --> 00:42:50.039
of each scenario. What would each outcome mean for your

634
00:42:50.079 --> 00:42:54.679
cash flow, profitability, competitive position, and team morale. This analysis

635
00:42:54.679 --> 00:42:59.719
helps you understand both the upside potential and the downside exposure.

636
00:43:00.440 --> 00:43:03.840
Forth says your ability to detect and respond to each

637
00:43:03.880 --> 00:43:09.159
scenario early. Can you identify which scenario is emerging within

638
00:43:09.199 --> 00:43:12.679
the first few weeks or months. What actions could you

639
00:43:12.719 --> 00:43:16.679
take to maximize success in positive scenarios or minimize damage

640
00:43:16.679 --> 00:43:22.480
and negative ones. This adaptive planning is often more valuable

641
00:43:22.519 --> 00:43:26.360
than precise probability estimates because it prepares you to respond

642
00:43:26.480 --> 00:43:29.679
effectively regardless of which scenario emerges.

643
00:43:30.440 --> 00:43:33.679
And Michael, that's a much more practical approach than trying

644
00:43:33.760 --> 00:43:38.119
to predict exact outcomes. But how would business owners handle

645
00:43:38.199 --> 00:43:43.760
situations where the potential downside could actually really harm the

646
00:43:43.800 --> 00:43:47.800
business and you know, beyond just sort of concepts, Yeah,

647
00:43:48.440 --> 00:43:49.280
give me a sense for that.

648
00:43:50.039 --> 00:43:54.880
Well, managing the bet company that the company risks requires

649
00:43:54.920 --> 00:43:58.760
a different approach than routine business decision, and the key

650
00:43:58.840 --> 00:44:01.679
is distinguished in between risk that could impair your business

651
00:44:01.719 --> 00:44:04.760
and risk that could destroy it. So here's a framework

652
00:44:04.760 --> 00:44:09.840
for managing high stakes decisions. First, apply the survival test

653
00:44:09.920 --> 00:44:12.679
to any major decision. Ask yourself, if this decision goes

654
00:44:12.719 --> 00:44:16.599
wrong in the worst reasonable scenario, could it force us

655
00:44:16.639 --> 00:44:20.599
out of business or create irreparable damage. If the answer

656
00:44:20.679 --> 00:44:24.840
is yes, you need additional safeguards, regardless of the probability.

657
00:44:24.840 --> 00:44:28.480
And this doesn't mean avoiding all stakes high stakes decisions.

658
00:44:29.559 --> 00:44:32.360
Businesses must take risks to grow, but it does mean

659
00:44:33.159 --> 00:44:38.239
structuring those risks carefully to protect your survival. Second, implement

660
00:44:38.880 --> 00:44:43.760
risk budgeting for major decisions. Just as you budget financial resources,

661
00:44:44.199 --> 00:44:48.599
budget risk exposure. Decide what percentage of your resources you're

662
00:44:48.599 --> 00:44:52.639
willing to risk on any single decision or initiative. Our

663
00:44:52.639 --> 00:44:56.599
common approach is limiting any single risk to ten to

664
00:44:56.599 --> 00:45:00.480
twenty percent of your cash reserves and your profit, and

665
00:45:00.639 --> 00:45:04.760
this prevents you from inadvertently concentrating too much risk in

666
00:45:04.800 --> 00:45:10.719
one area, even if each individual decision seems reasonable. Third,

667
00:45:13.320 --> 00:45:18.239
design circuit breakers into risk decisions. These are predetermined conditions

668
00:45:18.239 --> 00:45:22.199
that would trigger you to stop, modify, or even reverse

669
00:45:22.239 --> 00:45:25.880
a decision, and circuit breakers allow you to take calculated

670
00:45:25.960 --> 00:45:32.480
risk while maintaining control over exposure. For example, a manufacturing

671
00:45:32.480 --> 00:45:35.880
company wanted to enter a new market that required significant

672
00:45:35.880 --> 00:45:39.480
equipment investment. Instead of making the full investment immediately, they

673
00:45:39.559 --> 00:45:42.559
arranged a contract manufacturing agreement to test.

674
00:45:42.400 --> 00:45:45.719
Market demand only after proving demand.

675
00:45:45.800 --> 00:45:51.480
Did only after proving demand that they invest in their

676
00:45:51.519 --> 00:45:54.800
own equipment, so that before they made their full investment,

677
00:45:54.840 --> 00:45:58.079
they really You know, testing is something we always talk about,

678
00:45:58.480 --> 00:46:01.840
how what it is? One of the biggest advantages I

679
00:46:01.880 --> 00:46:05.800
think business owners have the ability to test things whatever

680
00:46:05.880 --> 00:46:09.880
it is. And then fourth, consider insurance and hedging strategies

681
00:46:09.880 --> 00:46:13.599
from major risks. So sometimes you can transfer mitigate specific

682
00:46:13.679 --> 00:46:18.280
risks to insurance partnerships or financial instruments. And while these

683
00:46:18.280 --> 00:46:22.199
strategies have costs, they might be worthwhile for decisions that

684
00:46:22.239 --> 00:46:28.199
would otherwise threaten your business survival. And we are running

685
00:46:28.239 --> 00:46:30.920
out of time, so let me see if I can

686
00:46:30.960 --> 00:46:34.199
wrap up here very quickly. As we wrap up today's

687
00:46:34.199 --> 00:46:38.480
episode on transforming your business through strategic decision making, let's

688
00:46:38.480 --> 00:46:42.360
summarize the complete strategic decision framework and how all four

689
00:46:42.400 --> 00:46:46.320
components work together to create a lasting competitive advantage. So

690
00:46:46.360 --> 00:46:50.480
we begin with decision velocity, developing the ability to make

691
00:46:50.840 --> 00:46:56.440
good decisions quickly when speed matters, and we discussed categorizing

692
00:46:56.519 --> 00:47:02.199
decisions by urgency and importance, using the rapid PID response

693
00:47:02.280 --> 00:47:07.360
model for urgent choices, implementing time boxed analysis for important decisions,

694
00:47:07.360 --> 00:47:12.679
and creating systems for multi stakeholder decision making. Next, we

695
00:47:12.760 --> 00:47:17.559
explore information sufficiency, knowing when you have enough information.

696
00:47:17.199 --> 00:47:21.719
To decide whether to decide, rather than endlessly seeking that

697
00:47:21.920 --> 00:47:28.960
perfect information recovered, identifying critical information requirements, assessing confidence levels,

698
00:47:29.320 --> 00:47:31.639
determining minimum thresholds.

699
00:47:31.000 --> 00:47:37.119
And establishing analysis budgets. To prevent paralysis. And then we

700
00:47:37.239 --> 00:47:43.079
examined risk assessment, systematically evaluating potential outcomes to make competent

701
00:47:43.159 --> 00:47:48.400
choices under uncertainty. We discuss scenario based risk assessment, managing

702
00:47:48.400 --> 00:47:52.480
the company decisions through circuit breakers and risk budgeting, and

703
00:47:52.599 --> 00:47:58.920
overcoming excessive risk. Aversion through structured approaches to the power

704
00:47:58.920 --> 00:48:03.519
of these frameworks comes from recognizing that uh decision making

705
00:48:03.719 --> 00:48:08.400
is a core business competency that can be systematically improved.

706
00:48:08.400 --> 00:48:11.559
When you master all four components, you develop what I

707
00:48:11.599 --> 00:48:16.440
call it decision advantage, the ability to consistently make decisions.

708
00:48:16.079 --> 00:48:17.920
Faster than yoursion.

709
00:48:18.599 --> 00:48:21.760
Remember, the great businesses aren't built by people who make

710
00:48:21.840 --> 00:48:26.760
perfect decisions. They're built by people who make decisions quickly

711
00:48:27.000 --> 00:48:30.480
and consistently. And in today's fast moving business environment, the

712
00:48:30.480 --> 00:48:36.199
ability to decide effectively under certain under uncertainty often matters

713
00:48:36.199 --> 00:48:40.119
more than having perfect information or unlimited resources.

714
00:48:41.360 --> 00:48:42.800
Final thoughts Michael.

715
00:48:43.360 --> 00:48:46.280
Yeah, I'd like I'd like to leave our visitors with

716
00:48:46.320 --> 00:48:50.079
these three three final thoughts. First, recognize that decision making

717
00:48:50.159 --> 00:48:53.280
is a skill that improves with practice. Like any other

718
00:48:53.360 --> 00:48:58.360
business competency. You can systematically develop better judgment through conscious

719
00:48:58.760 --> 00:49:05.400
effort and structured approaches. Second, understand that speed and quality

720
00:49:05.400 --> 00:49:09.199
of decision making aren't opposing forces, that complementary. When you

721
00:49:09.360 --> 00:49:13.000
use the right frameworks, good processes allow you to make

722
00:49:13.119 --> 00:49:17.920
better decisions faster, not choose between speed and quality. The

723
00:49:18.039 --> 00:49:21.840
businesses that consistently outperform their competitors are those that master

724
00:49:22.000 --> 00:49:26.760
both dimensions. And Third, embrace the fact that perfect decisions

725
00:49:27.000 --> 00:49:30.239
do not exist, but excellent decision making process does.

726
00:49:31.199 --> 00:49:35.880
Focus on improving your process rather than achieving perfect outcomes.

727
00:49:36.480 --> 00:49:41.960
And when you when you have systematic approaches to velocity,

728
00:49:42.039 --> 00:49:47.440
information sufficiency, risk assessment, and implementation, you'll make good decisions

729
00:49:47.480 --> 00:49:52.639
consistently even when facing unprecedented challenges. You know the business

730
00:49:52.719 --> 00:49:58.079
landscape will continue to evolve rapidly, creating new uncertainties and opportunities.

731
00:49:58.480 --> 00:50:01.880
The companies that thrive will be those led by decision

732
00:50:01.920 --> 00:50:06.840
makers who can navigate uncertainty confidently and act decisively when

733
00:50:06.880 --> 00:50:12.559
opportunities arise. By implementing this strategic decision framework that we've

734
00:50:12.559 --> 00:50:17.119
outlined today, you'll be prepared to lead your business successfully

735
00:50:17.159 --> 00:50:21.559
regardless of what challenges or opportunities emerge. And if you're

736
00:50:21.639 --> 00:50:26.400
serious about transforming decision making and capabilities and one professional guidance.

737
00:50:26.400 --> 00:50:29.320
Please reach out to us at Next Step CFO and

738
00:50:31.800 --> 00:50:34.480
to get a copy of the book Powerful Business Strategies,

739
00:50:34.519 --> 00:50:39.679
simply go to our website www dot NEXTSTEPCFO dot net.

740
00:50:40.199 --> 00:50:44.320
It's totally complementary. And until next Monday at noon Eastern time,

741
00:50:44.360 --> 00:50:47.559
where by the way, we will have another segment, another

742
00:50:48.719 --> 00:50:52.519
show about decision making for Chicky Obio. My name is

743
00:50:52.559 --> 00:50:57.280
Michael Baberta, and remember, don't keep doing what your competition

744
00:50:57.840 --> 00:50:58.320
is doing.

745
00:51:00.119 --> 00:51:03.119
You have been listening to Powerful Business Strategies finding out

746
00:51:03.199 --> 00:51:06.840
that everything you ever learned about growing your business is wrong.

747
00:51:07.119 --> 00:51:10.320
Tune in next week and every week at noon Eastern

748
00:51:10.400 --> 00:51:13.840
time on W four CY Radio with your host Michael

749
00:51:13.880 --> 00:51:18.519
Barbarita of NeXTSTEP CFO and moderator chugy Ovio